<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-01T22:24:27Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="oai:iarccum.org:doc/942">https://iarccum.org/oai/</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:iarccum.org:doc/942</identifier><datestamp>2026-09-12T21:35:23Z</datestamp><setSpec>documents</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Suggestions and comments on ARCIC-II 66: Growth in Communion: A Schema</dc:title><dc:creator>Anglican-Roman Catholic Dialogue of Canada</dc:creator><dc:description>At its meeting of February 27, 1987, in Toronto, Jean-Marie Tillard shared with ARC-Canada the document, &quot;Growth in Communion: A Schema&quot;, stressing its confidential nature and inviting Canadian ARC to offer critiques and suggestions for the June meeting of the ARCIC II subcommission. Introducing a paper which he read at that same meeting, &quot;Some Implications of the Fries-Rahner Theses for the Restoration of Full Koinonia Between Anglicans and Roman Catholics&quot;, Harry McSorley expressed the view that his paper might be of some use in developing paragraphs 4 through 8 of &quot;Growth in Communion: A Schema&quot;.

Meeting in Ottawa April 2-3, 1987, Canadian ARC heard a paper specifically devoted to the schema, entitled &quot;Reflections on 'Growth in Communion': A Schema&quot;, by Jean-Marc Laporte, as well as a presentation by Don Thompson which highlighted the importance of the diversity that characterizes Christian unity. The entire morning of April 3 and a good portion of the afternoon were devoted to discussion of the Schema. This was undertaken in three steps: first, the entire group identified issues and tasks that emerged in the previous evening's discussion of the Laporte/Thompson presentations; second, the large group divided into three sub-groups to discuss what were seen as the key issues, namely, I: Koinonia and Diversity, II: Factors Impeding Unity and Options for Overcoming Them, III: The Structure of the Document; third, plenary discussion of the reports from the three sub-groups and proposals for drawing up the final list of suggestions. The latter task was achieved at a meeting of May 6, 1987 of Laporte, Thompson and McSorley, with McSorley being charged with the final draft of suggestions that are found below.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Anglican-Roman Catholic Dialogue of Canada</dc:publisher><dc:date>1987-06-03</dc:date><dc:type>Text</dc:type><dc:format>text/html</dc:format><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://iarccum.org/doc/942</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>ARCIC-II 68/87</dc:identifier><dc:source>https://iarccum.org/doc/942</dc:source><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:relation>ARC-Canada : Anglican-Roman Catholic Dialogue of Canada : Reports</dc:relation><dc:relation>ARCIC-II : Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission II : Study papers</dc:relation><dc:relation>https://iarccum.org/doc/934</dc:relation><dc:rights>© 1987, Anglican-Roman Catholic Dialogue of Canada</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>