Two comments on Durham texts
ARCIC-II 35-2/85

Protocol: ARCIC-II 35-2/85
Author/editor(s): Pierre Duprey
Creation: 25 Feb. 1985 The date of original creation or publication, if known
Notes

Personal notes service: Notes written here are saved in your browser but they will be lost if you clear your cache. These notes are not visible to other users and are not transmitted to the webserver. This panel saves automatically. You can export this note for preservation or email it to a colleague.
See the Your notes page for all of your notes, to export the whole collection, and to import saved notes.

Make and store your personal notes in your own browser.

Persistent link: https://iarccum.org/doc/846 Please use this permanent URL in your publications and bookmarks to link to this document. The files below might be moved in the future, but this record will remain at this location.

Citation:

Read an excerpt below


Fonds/Collections:
Archival formats and locations:
Excerpt:

TWO COMMENTS BY FR DUPREY ON DURHAM TEXTS

page 7 para II. 2

“Grace is not to be considered as a thing or as a substance.

True – yet we have to say (page 11 § II. 10) that one can “depart from the grace of God as given”.

i.e. There is a result of God’s action in man (cf scholastic concept of habitus). This needs to be brought out more explicitly.

page 8 para II. 3

List of NT concepts of salvation.
At Durham did ask for “expiation/propitiation” to be listed;
perhaps not the best word – ilasmos is what matters; this can be better rendered as at-one-ment. cf Rom 3:25 Hebr 2:17 and passim and I John 2:2, 4:10.

Remember that Windsor Statement was criticized on our side for saying too little on this aspect.

25.2.85