A commentary commissioned for the study guide published in 2006, this commentary is written by a member of the dialogue. It examines the method of the commission’s work as well as the theological points which each side felt needed to be addressed from the perspective of their churches. What assured the members that they could sign the Agreed Statement as an adequate expression of shared understanding?
Persistent link: iarccum.org/doc/?d=224
This permanent link may be used to link to this document.