Show menu
CFR-RC-52-16 ~ Letter to Archbishop Donald Coggan regarding Pope Paul VI’s letter

Document data

Protocol: CFR-RC-52-16
Dated: 2 Feb. 1976
Lambeth Library: CFR/6/3/1/52

CFR, (Working correspondence)

Persistent link
This persistent link may be used in print publications to link to this document.

Protocol numbers

Many of the documents in this collection have been assigned a protocol number, eg. ARCIC-44. These simply indicate that the document was distributed to the commission members. They do not signify provenance.


Copyright in minutes, statements and other core papers is owned by the respective Commission. Requests for extensive quotation or use should be directed to the co-Chairs. Copyright in papers by named authors remains with the author.

John Howe ~ 2 Feb. 1976
This document has these items:
Related documents:

2nd February, 1976.

His Grace The Archbishop of Canterbury
Lambeth Palace
London, S.E.1

My Dear Donald,

The Pope’s letter to you of
30th November 1975

This letter is no more than one or two thoughts of mine, and of course I shall fully understand if you prefer to disregard it. I gather the Pope’s letter eventually reached you in January – a copy was kindly sent to me.

In his third paragraph, the Pope gives reasons why the Catholic Church does not regard it as admissible to ordain women to the priesthood. You may have heard, as I have, one or two gentle suggestions from Rome that you might care to make this letter public. I feel a certain amount of concern on two points.

First, I think it may be better that any Roman statement on this subject is made from the Vatican rather than through yourself.

My second concern is the nature of the reasons the Pope gives in that paragraph: “These reasons include: the example recorded in the Sacred Scriptures of Christ choosing his Apostles only among men; the constant practice of the Church, which has imitated Christ in choosing only men; and her living teaching authority which has consistently held that the exclusion of women from the priesthood is in accordance with God’s plan for his Church.”

These reasons seem to me theologically slight and inadequate for so important a subject. The significance of the appointment of the Twelve we know is theologically debatable. Beyond that the Pope’s position amounts to a reiteration of what the Catholic Church has done in the past. To any theologian, Anglican or Roman, this must appear a vulnerable defence. For example, in this context to ignore both the theology of Creation and the theology of Redemption is to avoid some of the subjects which are receiving most responsible and relevant consideration. To be brief and rather crude, I feel that if the Pope is publicly to defend the present Roman position, he needs to do better than that!

With best wishes,

Yours very sincerely,


c.c. Canon Michael Moore